The only content we will consider removing is spam, slanderous attacks on other members, or extremely offensive content eg. We will not remove any content for bad language alone, or for being critical of a book. Submitted by: Lobstergirl questions added questions answered. He is the one who suggests that the core of the problem in South Africa lies in the fact that the white man has destroyed all of the tradition connected with the old tribal situation.
Yet there are no new values to replace those that were destroyed in the breakdown of the tribal system.
He also maintains that most of the black leaders are no better than the whites because as soon as a black man gets some degree of power, he becomes as corrupt as any of the white men. The ideal leader would be someone who did not desire power and who, when receiving a certain degree of power, would use it for the benefit of the black race as a whole. Most importantly, Jarvis recognized his indifference to South Africa, his blindness to its happenings, and instead of sitting with that indifference and that apathy, he was able to promote change and develop a deep love for the people of South Africa and for the land of South Africa itself.
Without the action, the words are meaningless and hold no real value but a shallow lie. Without hope, the people of Ndotshemi, as well as the people of South Africa, would be spiritless and would have no drive to rebuild. Nelson Mandela, as in the real Apartheid, and new ways of efficient manual labor, as in the novel Cry the Beloved Country, have given them a reason to try.
Our pledge is to never and never again shall the laws of our land rend our people apart or legalize their oppression and repression. Paton tells us that to change the attitude toward blacks that good white men and good black men must work together. Both the blacks and whites need to forgive each other and move on together for the sake of South Africa.
Paton explains that society cannot exist without the other. In the beginning of the novel, Kumalo does not want to fully acknowledge the extent of the destruction of the tribal system. However, Kumalo desperately holds on to the flawed notion that they are still good people. Kumalo still believes that John is a humble carpenter, Gertrude is a good mother and wife and Absalom is an innocent young boy.
Kumalo still holds the idealistic view that Absalom will one day return to Ndotsheni and pursue an education at St. Stephen Kumalo is complacent in his village of Ndotesheni and only realizes the extent of the destruction of the tribal structure after he returns from Johannesburg. James Jarvis also is complacent about the condition of the native people; he chooses to ignore the native question rather than to debate it like his son Arthur does.
By characterizing Jarvis and Kumalo in this way, Paton is trying to make a very important point: human beings must not pretend problems are not there or assume that problems can fix themselves. Jarvis and Kumalo are both very complacent about the native question before going to Johannesburg. At the beginning of the novel Kumalo is very complacent; he does not want to fully acknowledge the extent of the destruction of the tribal system.
James Jarvis. Arthur Jarvis. Stephen Kumalo. Penguin Modern Classics. Related publisher series Lanterne. Related places Ixopo, Natal, South Africa. South Africa. Johannesburg, South Africa.
0コメント